Film- Sprockett on Vimeo
Director- Hazel Meeks
‘Freddy is faced with a
double-dare. Will he face his fear and enter the world of Old Man Sprockett?’
Representation:
•I think that the representations presented
in the film were certainly formed by the intended audience, as I think that a
lot of the audience would be of a comparable age to the young boys in the film,
therefore making it easier for them to enjoy and follow the narrative.
•The film doesn’t really deal with
any issues, though you could say that the two boys were pressuring/bullying him
to go into the house, and the focal boy turned it back on to them, pretending
that something bad or scary was happening, consequently making him look like
the daring one.
Narrative:
•As a spectator we don’t know much
about the story behind the plot, as nothing is really revealed, however this
does not affect the understanding of the plot as no extra knowledge is
required.
•The narrative is an example of
linear chronology, as it is all in chronological order. It starts with the boys
daring him, he goes to explore, meets the old man, they trick the other boys,
all the boys leave.
•Todorov’s theory can be applied
to this short: the equilibrium at the start when they boys dare him to go in,
then the disruption, where he is exploring and he hears the man shout at him.
Followed by the confrontation, where he meets Sprockett and the resolution
where they trick the other boys into thinking something bad is happening.
Finally, the new equilibrium is recognised as all the boys leave.
Genre:
· It is hard to place this film into one
particular genre, as it often is with short film, as it has such a broad
narrative and has conventions of all different genres. However I would say that
is definitely a family film, a possibly a thriller, or a light thriller
(sub-genre). This is because, I think the target audience puts in into the
family category, however the start of the short is slightly scary (especially
for the younger audience) therefore making it a thriller.
•It’s common for
short films to be difficult to put in to a genre, as they are often known as cross-genre
or hybrids. Furthermore, they can also fit into sub-genres. Short films also
often experimental, and this is beginning to become a genre in itself.
·
Steve Neal’s theory of repetition and
difference can be seen in this short. For example, one of the conventions of a
thriller genre that is repeated throughout is the low key lighting, often used
to illuminate the young boys face and create an eerie atmosphere. However the
difference can also be seen through the narrative, as it is clear that it is
not a thriller, and is a family film
Audience:
·
I believe nearly anyone could be expected to
watch this short. For example, a child of around the same age as the characters
could watch it as they can relate to it as they probably have been in a similar
position. Also because the film is very slightly scary at the start it’s
suitable for them to watch and on the other hand the humorous parts can
similarly be enjoyed by that aged audience. Furthermore, an adult could watch
this film as they could relate and reminisce to their childhood.
· I believe the audience with be pleased by this
film as it could cause them to reminisce about their childhood and to relate,
thus enjoying it even more. Furthermore, I think they will be pleased by the
surprising positive representation of ‘Old Man Sprockett’.
· This short film isn’t actually screened anywhere
else, but is positively referred to on blogs and other similar websites.
· This films has made it to the 2012 Virgin Media Shortlist, for the ‘The People’s Choice Award’ so is awaiting news on an award.
· This films has made it to the 2012 Virgin Media Shortlist, for the ‘The People’s Choice Award’ so is awaiting news on an award.
Film- Mixtape
Director- Luke Snellin
Representation:
The social groups
that are represented in the short film, are age and gender. The film has 2
characters, a young male and female.
· The representations have been constructed in a
way that suits the genre of the film, romance.
The young boy character is represented in a very
traditional way, from what he looks like to how he interacts with the girl. For
example, the boy makes the move on the girl as he gives her the mix tape as
what we assume is a romantic gesture; therefore representing a traditional relationship
that we would expect to see in films of a romantic genre, however not
necessarily of people his age. Lily is also represented typical, traditional
girl, dancing around in her bedroom and not making the first move on the boy.
She is presented in a ‘girly’ way.
·
No issues are dealt with in the film.
Narrative
· We don’t learn a lot about the story behind the plot, but we can gather that the two children have been friends for a while, and he has liked her for a while. The spectator doesn’t need any extra information about the story, as the narrative is still clear and enjoyable.
· We don’t learn a lot about the story behind the plot, but we can gather that the two children have been friends for a while, and he has liked her for a while. The spectator doesn’t need any extra information about the story, as the narrative is still clear and enjoyable.
·
The film has a linear narrative, as the plot is
in a chronological order. This makes the narrative easier to follow.
·
Roland Barthes theory can be applied, for
example an enigma code from the text would be when the boy is walking out his
house looking worried, causing the spectator to question where he’s going. You
could also apply Vogler’s theory of ‘the hereo’s journey’ top this film- the
boy in his room at the start of the film being the ‘hereos ordinary world’,
then the hero crosses the threshold and knock on the door of the girls house,
where he faces his ‘greatest ordeal’ of giving the mixtape, and then returns to
his ordinary world when he hears the girl listening to the tape.
·
The ending of the film has a big impact, and it
seems that the boy has been triumphant and the girl likes her present. It
allows the spectator to connect with the boy character, and empathise with how
he is feeling. It creates a happy feel for the film.
Genre:
Many genres are apparent in this film, for
example it would clearly fit into the genre of romance, as there is an
attraction between a male and female character and the short is about one
trying to get the attention of another through romantic gestures. Also there is
slight humour involved in this film, thus it could be categorised as comedy or
rom-com. Furthermore, the film has an overall happiness to it and is very
upbeat so is very family suitable, therefore could be classed as family film.
Short films in general are very experimental
with genre; this film is a cross-genre so will have aspects of many different
genres, like Romance, Comedy, and family. This is what makes shorts so unique
and enjoyable.
The plot of this film shows examples of Altman’s
syntactic codes, as it follows the sort of plot that the spectator would expect
to see in a romantic film. It follows the simple story of a boy, giving a girl
a present, and them falling in love. This makes the plot pleasing for the spectator
as the typical plot developments allow them to know what to expect. You could
also say that the mix tape in the film is a semantic code, as mix tapes are
very traditional gifts that young men/boys would give to girl that they liked.
Audience:
This film was posted on Vimeo and Virgin Media
Shorts. I expect that this anyone could watch this film and enjoy it.
Psychographic: Links to interests like, music, fashion and romance/comedy.
Demographics: suitable for both genders and all ages.
I believe that the audience will be very pleased
by this short film as it’s such a happy and jolly film. It has a joyful and
romantic ending that will make anyone smile.
This film has been screened on YouTube, Vimeo,
Virgin Media Shorts and other similar site. The film has been categorised as
many things like, a rom-com and a family film.
Winner - Grand Prize of Virgin Media Shorts 2009,
Nominated - Best Short Film for BAFTA 2010, Winner - Best Film, Landcrab FF
2010 and Winner - Best Film, Purbeck FF 2010.
This short has no production company but was
directed by Luke Snellin who now has his own website with other shorts he has
produced and also he has moved into producing music videos but this short is
his most well-known and successful.
Film – Post-It Love
Director – Si & AD
This short film is about two shy
office workers who like each other, and are expressing their love through
well-mastered and clever post-it note images scattered around the office.
Each of them takes turn to better their image until the finale when they both
catch each other in the act and give one and another a cheeky smile.
Representation:
The social group represented in this short film
is gender, and the characters are also represented as very timid. The
difference in gender between the two characters creates a contrast that is
highlighted throughout the narrative.
The theme of this film is a romance, and
therefore the characters are represented as traditional, as they try to show
their affection for each other; however the way that they do it is in an
artistic and modern way.
The two main characters are a young male and
female, who both work in the same office, but seem to have never seen each
other before. The woman, is represented in a traditional way as she looks very
typically feminine, being dressed in a very girly costume. She shows
traditional traits, like not leading in making a move and being very nervous
and shy. However, on the other hand she also arguably shows modern traits as
she too makes very outgoing and bold images with the Post-it notes and
therefore does make a move on the male character. Furthermore, she is working
in the office too at what appears to be the same level as the male.
I believe that the film doesn't deal with any
issues apart from the characters being shy, but they overcome it in a very
modern and unique way.
Narrative:
The plot does tell a story, of two people
meeting and showing their affections for each other, however we don’t know
anything about the characters story, who they are or what they do, we don’t
ever get introduced to their names.
The plot is chronological, and I think this is
to keep the narrative easy to follow, and to show their relationship and
feelings evolving.
Todorov’s theory cannot be applied to this film,
as there is no disruption to equilibrium; it is simply the story of a
developing relationship.
Genre:
The genre of this short film is undoubtedly
romance, as is a story of two people falling in love and expressing their love.
I also believe this short film does have an
element of comedy as in the first scene they are both standing at the
photocopier and do the exact same actions.
Rick Altman’s theory of semantic and syntactic
could be applied.
Steve Neale’s theory of repetition and
difference and been identified in this short film. For instance, an example of
the repetition would be the complementary, parallel soundtrack and the close-up
shots to show expressions of affection and attraction. Whereas the difference
would be the post-it note artwork, as this is the unique selling point, and the
key feature of the film.
Audience:
I believe that the intended audience for this
film would be both male and female, but possibly more towards women. However I
do think that nearly anyone would enjoy it as it’s so upbeat and cheerful.
I think that the audience will appreciate the
film as the narrative it is light-hearted and sweet, and the characters are
very likeable. The plot is simple, making it an ‘easy watch’, allowing the
spectator to just simply enjoy it.
The directors Si & AD have continually
worked together for over a decade. The production company for this short film
is ‘Academy Films’.
As far as I’m aware this film hasn’t received
any rewards or been nominated for an award.
Film – The black hole
Directors - Olly Williams and Phil
Samson aka Diamond Dogs
A sleep-deprived office worker
accidentally discovers a black hole and then greed gets the better of him as he
gets himself locked in a safe.
Representation:
The social group represented in this short film
is the male middle class. This is a very stereotypical representation of a male’s
office working environment with dark, dull colours and just basic design.
The representation of the male character is also
quite stereotypical as he has stayed on at work and his expressions and body
language shows him extremely bored and fed up. This could be seen as a negative
representation as he doesn’t seem bothered about his work nor does he have a
positive attitude towards his work.
The films deals with some issues like greed, as
the male character doesn't think twice about stealing money from the safe.
Another issue could be his attitude towards his work.
Narrative:
The plot is chronological, and I think this is
to keep the narrative easy to follow, and to show different events unfolding.
Todorov’s theory could possibly be applied to
this short: the equilibrium at the start when he is just simply copying work,
then the disruption, where he discovers the black hole sheet. Followed by the
confrontation, where he uses the black hole to steal from the vending machine
and then when he gets into the locked door to the safe. Finally, the new
equilibrium is recognised as he gets trapped in the safe and everything goes
quiet again like the start.
Genre:
I personally think this short is a cross-genre
as it has elements of comedy, adventure and thriller. This is common for short
films as they often experimental with genre and will cross many genre categories.
The short film is very conventional; this is due
to the fact that there is no dialogue but instead diegetic sound played
throughout the whole short film, such as the error beeping of the photocopier.
Audience:
I I would expect anyone to watch and enjoy this
film. It’s suitable for all age groups and is very well done and unique, so I believe
it would be widely enjoyed by most people.
This short was created for the London Short Film
Festival and won the Virgin Media Shorts Award 2008.
On IMDB the film is categorised to three genres,
comedy, crime and drama.
Production House: HSI London.
You've posted 4 - good Isaac. Some of the entries under headings especially in the later posts are rather short. You should try to extend points more in these ones. For example, you need to give examples of how Neale and Altman can be applied - you have just said that they can!
ReplyDelete